Don't mean to barge in on this one, but I've been waiting for about a month for this to be evaluated, and I'd really appreciate it if you could give it a quick look, since I need this calc in order to begin working on the verse.
Hmm, let me consult with other members of the calc group, because while what you say makes sense, I'm only using the value that was previously used by Kepekley, which is the circumference of the earth.
Yes, you're right. I thought it would be better to find explosion radius from Earth surface area because I thought sockwave attenuation whouldn't be as atrong as on a flat surface because it collects in one point after it trawles half of the Earth circumference
Regarding this calc for Enel, since the only difference in the two results I got was that it looks at the crater from two different perspectives, do you think I should make an average out of the results and use that as the AP?