Fandom

VS Battles Wiki

A Fandom user
  Loading editor
  • Your input is needed here .

      Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
  • I've been thinking about this for a long time and I agree with you. Since it is a staff thread I cannot post there. I'd be happy if you could post this for me. If you don't want to, feel free to use my arguments and examples.

    I agree with TLT1.

    Speed is dependent on time and distance.

    Distance is always going from point A to point B. Thus distance is always 1 Dimensional. A 1D being can cover a meter just like 3D humans do. It's the same meter.

    This also applies to higher spatial dimension. You can calculate the distance in 4D space using multidimensional vectors, but I doubt a calc like that will ever happen.

    This in turn means the only variable speed is dependent on when it comes to higher dimensions is time.

    Just like how a being with 4 spatial dimensions is immeasurably beyond a being with only 3 in power, a being with 2 temporal dimensions is immeasurably beyond a being with only 1 in speed.

    Imagine this like in Umineko. The humans live in the first temporal dimension and the witches in higher. For Beatrice the time passing in the lower level is irrelevant. Like TLT1 said it's like reading a story, you can start and end wherever you want. You can read it backwards. Or you don't read it at all.

    The whole seeing the layer below you as fiction comes from having more temporal dimensions than the ones below you. No matter how many spatial dimensions you have time flows the same for you if you only have 1 temporal dimension.

      Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
  • Surface Escape Velocity

    So I made a blog on how to actually calculate it.

    You did say at one point that the closer you get to the singularity of a black hole, the more and more velocity it is required for you to escape it. Would the velocity to escape a black hole always be the speed of light, no matter how closer you are to its singularity?

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • It might be possible that a small number of atoms weere destroyed due to which the crator was formed by the release of the energy.

      A reasonable assumption, yes.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, then again there are a bunch of other possible options as well. 

        Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
  • I have sent you a PM. It is about new calc group member candidates.

      Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
  • Come to the VS chat. We need to talk about that Dragonball speed downgrade.

      Loading editor
    • View all 14 replies
    • I dunno.

        Loading editor
    • ok, so even if we dont accept fanofrpg's calc at all, and ignore the light statement as a figure of speech. We can use piccolo's feat, then lowball it, and ignore certain unquantified zenkais to get to an absolute low end where the final result of the chain gives us ssj goku at 28x ftl. 


      Keep in mind though thats kind of an absolute low end. 

        Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
  • Sorry for late reply but I wanna say thank you for replying toward my question about Krishna.

      Loading editor
  • [Your thoughts would be appreciated in this thread http://vsbattles.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:664253#29]

      Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
  • Okay, from 'Strongest chara of your Nationality' thread, I found you mentioning Jaina Mathematics.

    What is Jaina Math, TLT1? How does it have anything to do with being Tier 1-A?

      Loading editor
    • Jains (and presumably intellectuals among other religions which sprouted from the samkhya philosophy) had a primitive notion, of what we now know as cantor sets. tl;dr its basically starting off with the basic infinity (known in mathematics as a transfinite number if we are being precise about definitions) known as aleph naut (which is equal to the number of all natural numbers), and going up from there into an endless list of infinities, each surpassing the last in such a way that it makes the previous infinity look trivial or nigh zero-like in comparison. Of course, this doesnt stop at the infinith infinity either, since you can go even bigger than that, for you can have an infinite set such that it is bigger than the infinith ranked infinity. For more information about this last particular thing, look up cantor's paradox.


      But yeah, the jain version of that is much simpler and less rigorous than cantor's version. 

        Loading editor
    • firstly, thanks for the explanation! ^_^

      Hmm, so basically its just transfinite that goes on to infinity? just another orders of infinity? Okay, so... Krishna (supposed Tier 1-A in the thread I stated above) surpass infinite orders of infinity then I assume? not only 'basic infinity'?

        Loading editor
    • BlaLig wrote:
      firstly, thanks for the explanation! ^_^

      Hmm, so basically its just transfinite that goes on to infinity? just another orders of infinity? Okay, so... Krishna (supposed Tier 1-A in the thread I stated above) surpass infinite orders of infinity then I assume? not only 'basic infinity'?

      no, krishna is not based on jainism or any samkhya philosophy for that matter. He is a part of the vaishnav pantheon. Vaishnavism itself was based on theistic philosophies of the vedic era which were diametrically opposed to samkhya, so stuff from the samkhya philosophy and its offshoots like jainism do not apply to krishna's pantheon. As a result krishna would not be 1-A. However his pantheon does have infinitely many universes so he would be 2-A or "At least 2-A". 

      However, enlightned souls like a mythical version of mahavira or any enlightened true self can be potentially 1-A in jainism and likely even in the earlier versions of  buddhism. 




      I could tell you more about the theistic history of indic religion and its relation to krishna if you want to know. 

        Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
  • The main reason why I disagree with your points is that 2 dimension is length x width. 3 dimensional is length x width x height. It is simply geometry. If we remove height from length x width, it will be 2D. This is simply a opposite here. If you want to argue otherwise, then be my guest. Just know it is really that simple if a verse excluded time and space is explicitly been mentioned without time.

      Loading editor
    • I think you do not understand what I am trying to say here at all. The unowns being a part of a different continuum outside the space-time of the universe does not make them beyond time or anything as such. Their own continuum exists separate to the universe- thats how their """"dimension""" works. (also, the unown dimension is not a mathematical dimension, it is a misuse of the actual term for dimension) 


      Also, what do you mean be "simply geometry", our system is entirely based on projective geometry only. 

        Loading editor
    • A Fandom user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.