Hi, I was wondering if the Overmonitor's page should be changed slightly. Its stats make it a 1-A Tier ranking, but considering exactly what it is I don't thank thats accurate enough.
I know its not a tier 0 entity because of the The Writer, but I do think we need a slightly higher ranking for it then 1-A, perhaps 1-A+.
Since its literally the original canvas that everything is written, drawn or edited upon its easily outside of even the level of the Outerverse. In fact the outerverse is itself is nothing more then a speck of dust or a bacterium next to it (since the Outerverse already exists as Monitor-Space, and the Overmonitor is outside of even that)
So I think it needs either an adjustment for its stats or a possibly the tier rankings need to be changed for unique examples of beings who are apparently higher then true 1-A's.but stll not enough to qualify for Tier 0, one other character example I can think of is The Nameless Mist who created Yog-Sothoth and yet is outside even it.
I thought I would ask you first about this before I ask the other admins.
Your answer will be kept in mind, although destroying that said pocket dimension with an attack (physical/chi-based) would mean that his/her physical strength would scale, correct?
I want to write a concise explanation for why Kaguya's reality warping of a pocket universe does not directly translate to her AP/Striking Strength and post it on the rules page. It may be a better idea other than just saying "please do not do xyz, etc".
Well, it is rather self-explanatory that characters who are able to withstand the full force of energy manipulation, reality warping, etcetera, attacks from equivalent opponents, and also harm each other with physical strikes, do tend to scale, whereas ones that cannot, do not scale.
However, before adding a new rule, you should preferably talk with the rest of the staff about what exactly that it should say.
Hello Antvasima, I'm theglassman12, and I have 2 questions for you if you don't mind. Should the kaioken be considered as a Statistic Amplification ability since it increases Goku's base stats to surprise the opponent in short bursts, not to mention it's not really a transformation since he can't use the form as long as his super saiyan forms? And is it all right if I can edit Goku's profile? I just want to edit the Powers and Abilities section and add some feats for him.
Ok, I only asked because I saw Goku Black's page, and his powers and abililities section look more refined than in Goku's profile. I figured the additional info of blocking trunk's sword and other stuff he has done should be his feats.
In case you ask or are in doubt, i was wondering if we can still keep the likely mountain level rating as, in simple scaling:
-This Guy is the one whose has that statement in the scan, is also stronger than this guy who has some city level statement thing as well as being stated as far stronger than his "other self" that is this guy who can pierce through whole mountain ranges.
What do you think?
Also, though i don't really feel much of it, i want to apologize somewhat for my behavior on that thread involving Matt and Cal. Though in all honesty, they truly didn't say anymore unlike the users in that thread. At least THEY had the time and thought to give something out in there even if what they said in it was not pass through in acceptation. Really, our staff doing things like that can REALLY get on my nerves. Of course Kav gave me a PM about it but...you know how i am with subjects like that nowadays...somewhat.
Wanted to add that in here to tell you of it even though i moved on from it since i got less grouchy for them doing what i say of them wanting to do.
"At least City level, likely Mountain level" seems fine though.
As for the near conflict in that thread, no problem at all. Apology accepted. We just have to be careful to stick together and not to fight anymore amongs the staff, as the wiki is in a sensitive state.
I think it's meant to be big or something, but i'm uncertain now that i understand the mountain ratings standards...thing.
Fair enough. It's like that, but i just wanted to have a second opinion before i add it given it's wording is different from what i found. Though as i can't recall where i found it at, this is the only one aside from scaling that can used for it (ignoring our standards for Mountain level, mind you).
IDK, that honestly depends how they act as i tend to watch everything quietly while i do my thing. If they can learn more from my words, i can consider being a little more cooperative. Though in all honesty, i doubt much improvement will happen so it's however things go from there...if anything at all, that is.